Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: I thought that DeepSjeng 1.5 was stronger than Ruffian 1.0.1

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 13:17:19 08/11/03

Go up one level in this thread


On August 11, 2003 at 15:38:29, Matthew White wrote:

>On August 09, 2003 at 12:28:55, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On August 09, 2003 at 11:59:36, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>>http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/
>>
>>I guess that Ruffian is better thanks to superior book.
>>
>>I remember that Leo posted results of the nunn2 match when Deep Sjeng won.
>>but Deep Sjeng's book is not very good to win games and
>>Deep Sjeng could score only 59.5/84 in the first division(less than 71%) when
>>Ruffian1.0.1 could get 79/100 against better opponents that included
>>Crafty,Yace,Gandalf,nimzo2000.
>>
>>For Ruffian's 79% see http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/his3rdedition.html
>>
>>Uri
>Didn't Jeroen Noomen tune Sjeng's book?

I do not know
If he tuned them then based on results it seems that tuning of Ruffian's book
was more productive

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.