Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:04:57 08/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 12, 2003 at 03:28:10, Steven Edwards wrote: >On August 11, 2003 at 23:03:29, Rick Bischoff wrote: > >>You must have been *really* bored to sit there and wait for 7, 8 and 9... not to >>mention 10 and 11.. I'll expect your follow up post in 40 some years :-) > >Forty years!? Alas, being seriously disabled from diabetes, I'm not sure I can >make it for another forty months. But I will do what I can. Anyway, deep >enumeration is not for impatient. > >Here are the first two subtree counts for depth ten: > >Na3: 2440848135252 >Nc3: 3096505857746 I believe that with hash tables it is possible to be significantly faster than 40 years even for depth 11. Even without them I believe that depth 9 takes less than 24 hours with fast hardware for my perft so depth 11 probably takes less than 3 years. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.