Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 11:03:52 08/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 12, 2003 at 13:22:32, Brian Richardson wrote: >On August 12, 2003 at 12:03:15, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On August 12, 2003 at 06:23:26, macaroni wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>>in an alpha-beta search, with hash tables, null moving, history heuristic, >>>killers, pvs search, quiescent search, and itterative deepening. >>>about how many nodes would one expect after a 6 ply search from the opening >>>position, I get 13,000, is this way to many? or about right. >>>Also, about how much extra performance would one expect from killers? I seem to >>>get a really marginal increase, what replacement scheme is good for killers? >>>thanks. >> >> >>I get 42,000 as a reference. 13,000 may well be reasonable depending on how >>you extend in the search., > >This seems odd. I get only 1667 nodes with Crafty v19.3 >(and only slightly more with mt=1): You have a problem. Delete "position.bin". :) > > >Crafty v19.3 (2 cpus) > >White(1): sd 6 >search depth set to 6. >White(1): noise 1 >noise level set to 1. >White(1): go > clearing hash tables > time surplus 0.00 time limit 22.50 (3:30) > depth time score variation (1) >starting thread 1 > 1 0.00 0.25 1. e4 > 1-> 0.00 0.25 1. e4 > 2 0.00 0.43 1. e4 e5 <HT> > 2-> 0.00 0.43 1. e4 e5 <HT> > 3 0.00 0.43 1. e4 e5 <HT> > 3-> 0.01 0.43 1. e4 e5 <HT> > 4 0.01 0.43 1. e4 e5 <HT> > 4-> 0.01 0.43 1. e4 e5 <HT> > 5 0.01 0.43 1. e4 e5 <HT> > 5-> 0.01 0.43 1. e4 e5 <HT> > 6 0.01 0.43 1. e4 e5 <HT> > 6-> 0.01 0.43 1. e4 e5 <HT> > time=0.01 cpu=200% mat=0 n=1667 fh=94% nps=10k > ext-> chk=1 cap=1 pp=0 1rep=1 mate=0 > predicted=0 nodes=1667 evals=853 > endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 > SMP-> split=6 stop=0 data=2/32 cpu=0.02 elap=0.01 > >White(1): e4 > time used: 0.01 >learning position, wtm=1 value=43 >Black(1):
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.