Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 15:37:16 08/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 14, 2003 at 18:32:01, Uri Blass wrote: >1)If your first move did not fail high than it is better to have bad order of >the rest of the moves because if you have bad order of the rest of the moves >you have good chances that the first move is going to fail high against them. > >If you have good order of moves than the you get no points for the fact that >your second move failed high. It's late in here, and I don't get this at all. I don't understand a thing of what you are saying, and what I do understand, looks wrong. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.