Author: Peter Fendrich
Date: 16:34:16 08/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 14, 2003 at 18:31:25, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On August 14, 2003 at 18:02:16, Peter Fendrich wrote: > >>Maybe it's possible to get higher values for 1FH and still have a bigger >>search tree and worse move ordering. I don't understand how, though... > >For the remaining 5-6%, do you rather fail high on the 2nd or on the >40th move? I don't have the whole picture yet but with hash disabled killer moves seems to take over the scene completely. > >Maybe you are just seeing statistical variation as well. You're probably right here. It was only preliminary results and I rushed to the keyboard crying loudly, far too fast I think. New test gave me the other way around but the differences are surprisingly small. /Peter >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.