Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:43:51 08/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 14, 2003 at 20:06:53, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: > > > >If Kasparov had played 16.g3 instead of 16.Bxh7+ it seems that he would have >won.HIARCS 8 played both sides after 16.g3 up to ply 14(which is very deep) >and white won.This whole shootout experiment took about 2 days to complete. >The very interesting thing is that at the ply 11 shootout the result was >a draw. which may show that this ply 13 shootout may well convey the truth >about this game.Deep Junior is an unsound program and the authors still need >to explain 10..Bxh2???????????? Maybe you should try to give Junior the black side after Bxh2+ Hiarcs does not choose Bxh2+ so I am not surprised if it does not know to continue it correctly. A game at 1 hour per move when Junior8 is losing against Hiarcs8 can be more convincing if you want to convince people that Junior's move is bad. Uri Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.