Author: Anthony Cozzie
Date: 07:03:06 08/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 2003 at 09:56:35, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 15, 2003 at 08:36:00, Anthony Cozzie wrote: > >>[D]r4r1k/1b3p1p/pq3N1p/n3p2N/Pp6/3Bn3/1PP1Q1PP/R4R1K w - - 0 26 >> >>1. Rg1 Rfc8 2. Bxh7 Qd4 3. Rab1 >> = (-0.89) Depth: 5/12 00:00:00.25 40kN >>1. Rg1 Rfd8 2. Rae1 Bxg2 3. Rxg2 Nxg2 4. Qxg2 Qg1 5. Rxg1 >> = (-1.00) Depth: 6/16 00:00:00.70 153kN >>1. Rg1 Rfd8 2. Rae1 Bxg2 3. Rxg2 Nxg2 4. Qxg2 Qb7 5. Rxe5 Qxg2 >> + (-0.70) Depth: 7/19 00:00:01.36 377kN >>1. Rg1 e4 2. Bxe4 Bxe4 3. Nxe4 f5 4. Nef6 Rfd8 >> = (-0.09) Depth: 7/19 00:00:02.15 685kN >>1. Rg1 e4 2. Bxe4 Bxe4 3. Nxe4 f5 4. Qxe3 Qxe3 >> = (0.00) Depth: 8/23 00:00:03.48 1192kN >>1. Rf2 e4 2. Bxe4 Bxe4 3. Nxe4 f5 4. Nef6 Rfc8 5. Qd3 Rd8 >> = (-0.04) Depth: 9/30 00:00:20.53 7692kN >>1. Rf3 Bxf3 2. Qxf3 Qd4 3. Re1 Qh4 4. g3 Nxc2 >> = (0.25) Depth: 10/33 00:00:42.98 16634kN >>1. Rg1 Qd4 2. Rae1 Nec4 3. Bxc4 Nxc4 4. Rd1 Qc5 5. Nd7 Nb6 6. Nxf8 Rxf8 >> = (0.43) Depth: 11/39 00:01:25.00 33717kN >>1. Rf3 Bxf3 2. Qxf3 Qd4 3. Re1 Qh4 4. g3 Nac4 5. gxh4 Ng4 6. Bxc4 Nf2 >> + (0.73) Depth: 12/48 00:05:37.18 133815kN >>1. Rf3 Nxg2 2. Qxg2 Rg8 3. Qe2 Rg5 4. Be4 Rc8 5. h4 Rg6 6. Nd7 Qd4 7. Bxb7 Qxh4 >>8. Qh2 Qxh2 9. Kxh2 >> = (1.24) Depth: 12/48 00:12:16.28 298098kN >> >>Very tough for Zappa. 5 minutes. It changes its mind a lot here as well, which >>never helps - Rg1, then Rf2, then Rf3, then Rg1, then Rf3 again. >> >>anthony > >I wonder how does zappa knows not to consider first Rg1 at depth 12. >zappa has a score for Rg1 at depth 11 and the first output at depth 12 is a >score for Rf3. > >Uri I'm not sure what is strange (other than the slow times): Zappa likes Rg1 at depth 11, fails high on Rf3 at depth 12, and ends up with Rf3 as the best move at depth 12. anthony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.