Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 10:43:59 08/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 2003 at 13:43:22, Dann Corbit wrote: >On August 15, 2003 at 12:19:54, Ricardo Gibert wrote: > >>On August 15, 2003 at 04:18:54, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On August 14, 2003 at 22:40:04, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >>> >>>>If doubling NPS (all else being equal) produces a roughly 40 to 75 elo strength >>>>increase, then doubling knowledge produces how much elo strength increase? >>>> >>>>Or do increases in knowledge follow a completely different type of relationship >>>>to playing stength? >>>> >>>>What impact on NPS does a doubling of knowledge have? I know it slows it down, >>>>but what is the relationship (a rule of thumb) between the 2? It is said that >>>>adding knowldege in hardware does not exact a speed penalty, but can this really >>>>be true? Or is the speed penalty simply less apparent? >>>> >>>>How much attention should a programmer give to lowering the EBF of his program >>>>versus adding more knowledge? >>> >>>I believe that lowering the EBF is more important. >> >> >>I agree with this 100%. >> > >I believe that the only way to lower the EBF is to make the program smarter. >(Add knowledge). > >You may not agree 100%. Let me ammend that to "the only useful way" to lower the EBF.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.