Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:23:31 08/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 2003 at 13:43:22, Dann Corbit wrote: >On August 15, 2003 at 12:19:54, Ricardo Gibert wrote: > >>On August 15, 2003 at 04:18:54, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On August 14, 2003 at 22:40:04, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >>> >>>>If doubling NPS (all else being equal) produces a roughly 40 to 75 elo strength >>>>increase, then doubling knowledge produces how much elo strength increase? >>>> >>>>Or do increases in knowledge follow a completely different type of relationship >>>>to playing stength? >>>> >>>>What impact on NPS does a doubling of knowledge have? I know it slows it down, >>>>but what is the relationship (a rule of thumb) between the 2? It is said that >>>>adding knowldege in hardware does not exact a speed penalty, but can this really >>>>be true? Or is the speed penalty simply less apparent? >>>> >>>>How much attention should a programmer give to lowering the EBF of his program >>>>versus adding more knowledge? >>> >>>I believe that lowering the EBF is more important. >> >> >>I agree with this 100%. >> > >I believe that the only way to lower the EBF is to make the program smarter. >(Add knowledge). I agree(assuming as you explained in the next post that you also make the program better) but the knowledge does not have to be evaluation knowledge and it seems clear to me based on the rest of the post that Ricardo meant to evaluation knowledge when he used the word knowledge. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.