Author: blass uri
Date: 01:21:54 10/31/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 30, 1998 at 18:16:55, odell hall wrote: >Hi CCC > > > Yesterday I upgraded to a Cyrix 233 16megs of Ram, I ran the benchmark test for >rebel 10 and got a rating of 2511, however the internal rating that rebel 9 >assigns itself has actually decreased from 2550 to 2533!! I have noticed That i >am searching almost three times as many nodes per second than I was with my pent >120, Nodes per second range from 60,000 to 80,000. Can anyone explain the >conflict? I might add that the internal rating for rebel10 went from 2555(pent >120) to 2600 (pent233). Although the benchmark test suggest a much greater >rating increase. Lastly could someone tell me how many rating pts are affected >by hash tables? I have read on the internet somewhere that hash tables are not >that import as far as performance with certain programs. I know that it means >alot for fritz 5. I do not know that it means a lot for fritz5 I know only that it is the claim of chessbase. I found in the past that sometimes very big hash tables are counter productive for fritz5 when I give it positions that it needs hours to solve I found that for the same examples big hash tables became productive when I upgraded to fritz5(16 bit). I am interested in the results of a nunn match between fritz and itself when one side has more hash tables and the other has faster hardware to see what is more important. I believe that faster hardware is more important then Ram that you can get at the same price also for fritz5. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.