Author: ALI MIRAFZALI
Date: 15:55:16 08/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 2003 at 10:49:52, Sune Fischer wrote: >On August 14, 2003 at 20:06:53, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: > >What matters is that Garry couldn't find the refutation over the board. > >-S. > > >> >>If Kasparov had played 16.g3 instead of 16.Bxh7+ it seems that he would have >>won.HIARCS 8 played both sides after 16.g3 up to ply 14(which is very deep) >>and white won.This whole shootout experiment took about 2 days to complete. >>The very interesting thing is that at the ply 11 shootout the result was >>a draw. which may show that this ply 13 shootout may well convey the truth >>about this game.Deep Junior is an unsound program and the authors still need >>to explain 10..Bxh2???????????? >> >> >>New game - Hiarcs 8 >>Shootout (Hiarcs8, 13ply) >> >>1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 0-0 5.Bd3 d5 6.cxd5 exd5 7.Nge2 Re8 8.0-0 Bd6 >>9.a3 c6 10.Qc2 Bxh2+ 11.Kxh2 Ng4+ 12.Kg3 Qg5 13.f4 Qh5 14.Bd2 Qh2+ 15.Kf3 Qh4 >>16.g3 Qh2 1.84/13 1:17:31 17.f5 1.59/13 1:23:20 Qh3 (Nd7) 2.19/14 >>1:23:20 18.Rg1 1.94/14 1:23:20 Nh2+ 1.69/14 1:23:20 19.Kf2 1.69/14 0 >>Ng4+ 1.69/14 1:02:30 20.Ke1 1.69/14 45:42 Nd7 1.44/14 1:23:20 21.e4 >>(Rc1) 1.20/14 1:23:20 21...Qh2 1.20/14 1:02:30 22.Bf4 (Bg5) 1.13/14 >>1:23:20 22...dxe4 1.13/14 1:02:30 23.Nxe4 1.30/14 4:07 Nb6 1.30/14 >>1:02:30 24.f6 1.02/14 1:23:20 Bf5 1.13/14 1:23:20 25.Kd2 1.20/14 >>1:23:20 Rxe4 1.17/14 1:23:20 26.Bxe4 1.42/14 1:23:20 Re8 1.45/14 26:36 >>27.Be5 1.45/14 1:23:20 Bxe4 (Nxe5) 1.62/14 1:23:20 28.Qxe4 1.62/14 >>1:02:30 Nc4+ 1.66/14 1:16:42 29.Kc1 1.73/14 1:23:20 Nxf6 1.95/14 >>1:23:20 30.Qg2 1.95/14 1:03:16 Qxg2 1.95/14 52:54 31.Rxg2 2.02/14 10:15 >> Ne4 2.02/14 7:27 32.b3 2.02/14 12:59 Ne3 2.02/14 8:11 33.Rg1 2.00/14 >>3:30 g5 (Nd5) 2.04/14 18:28 34.Re1 2.31/14 9:10 Ng2 2.13/14 1:57 >>35.Rf1 2.13/14 1:41 f6 2.32/14 5:39 36.Bxf6 (Bc7) 2.13/14 3:03 >>36...Nxf6 2.01/14 1:42 37.Rf2 2.27/14 2:37 Ne1 2.31/14 57 38.Kd2 >>2.31/14 1:36 Nc2 2.32/14 1:24 39.Kxc2 2.36/14 35 Ng4 2.43/14 53 >>40.Raf1 2.43/14 12 Nxf2 2.42/14 1:41 41.Rxf2 2.42/14 5 Re3 2.55/14 >>1:12 42.g4 2.55/14 34 Kg7 (Kh8) 2.58/14 40 43.Rg2 2.73/14 1:39 Kg6 >>2.71/14 1:38 44.Ng3 2.62/14 1:02 Rf3 2.70/14 54 45.Nh5 (Ne4) 2.74/14 >>2:17 45...Kf7 2.79/14 2:53 46.Rg3 2.80/14 2:23 Rf1 2.80/14 4:19 47.Re3 >>(Kd3) 2.82/14 7:31 47...Rg1 2.87/14 7:03 48.Ng3 2.87/14 2:35 Kg6 >>2.98/14 18:01 49.Kd3 2.99/14 9:36 Rg2 3.13/14 20:09 50.Ke4 (b4) 3.38/14 >> 16:39 50...h6 3.77/14 24:27 51.Ke5 3.77/14 2:03 Rf2 4.25/14 13:33 >>52.Kd6 4.43/14 5:44 Rf4 4.54/14 7:58 53.Ke7 (Re6+) 5.42/14 5:41 >>53...Rf7+ 5.55/14 2:39 54.Ke8 5.55/14 16 Kg7 5.55/14 2:18 55.Re7 >>5.98/14 3:32 Rxe7+ 6.09/14 1:10 56.Kxe7 6.09/14 0 Kg6 6.23/14 1:47 >>57.b4 (Kd7) 6.41/14 6:26 57...Kg7 6.85/14 5:33 58.Nh5+ (Kd6) 10.80/14 >>9:18 58...Kh7 (Kg6) 10.80/14 20 59.b5 10.80/14 2:38 1-0 >> >>am We all know (or should for some people here) that humans suck at chess.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.