Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:32:14 08/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 17, 2003 at 10:03:26, Bob Durrett wrote: >On August 17, 2003 at 09:52:18, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 17, 2003 at 09:32:19, Rex wrote: >> >>>With Brutus becoming more and more exciting to watch with its strength and >>>development will software chess like we know it today become the thing of the >>>past? >>> >>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=221 >> >>No >> >>I see no evidence that brutus is better than the top software. >> >>Other programs already did similiar performance against humans. >> >>Hardware for chess also does not worth much because the hardware is static when >>a software becomes better when you buy a new hardware. >> > >Sorry, Uri, but that sounds too much like wishful thinking to me. : ) >The handwriting is on the wall!!! It is not the current performance that >matters, but is the potential or promise of this new approach which should get >our attention and debate, IMHO. > >Bob D. No potential was in the past not today (at least not for chess). see martin's reply. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.