Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:21:08 08/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 19, 2003 at 05:47:38, Jonas Bylund wrote: >On August 19, 2003 at 04:14:17, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>IMHO: Above mentioned headline in Chessbase site is big exaggeration. It wasn't >>sensational - just about predicted result. I hope next time more realistic >>headline like "Brutus played just as predicted". >> >>Jouni > >Actually "Brutus played just as predicted" is an exaggeration too, a lot of >people said that it would fail miserably etc, you know the usual rant about >computers not being stronger than 2200. No Most of the humans are simply against playing computers because they believe they are too strong. computers are not allowed to play for Fide rating. What is the reason for it? Humans do not believe that they are weak. I do not know about a single person who said that Brutus is going to fail miserably. I wonder if there are people who said it after knowing previous results of computers in tournaments. How many times do you need to see computers perfrom above 2700 to predict that it is going to happen again. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.