Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?)

Author: Steve Maughan

Date: 04:20:27 08/19/03

Go up one level in this thread

Omid,

>I was wondering, wouldn't it be better to write an SEE which neglects backed-
>up attacks, and not use it for pruning? This way it yields a good move
>ordering at no cost (e.g., using Ed's attack tables), and isn't liable to
>risks of pruning.

If you read Ed's page you'll see that Ed's method accounts for x-ray threats and
is probably (almost certainly) more costly than SEE.  The reason Ed makes it
work is that he's using the information for other reasons as well.

Regards,

Steve

• Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Omid David Tabibi 06:05:09 08/19/03
  • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Tord Romstad 09:25:30 08/19/03
    • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 10:56:53 08/19/03
      • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Uri Blass 14:48:20 08/19/03
        • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 14:57:38 08/19/03
      • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Russell Reagan 13:37:40 08/19/03
        • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 14:12:21 08/19/03
          • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Peter Fendrich 14:26:43 08/19/03
            • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dieter Buerssner 15:02:10 08/19/03
            • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Russell Reagan 14:29:46 08/19/03
              • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Peter Fendrich 14:59:59 08/19/03
        • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Sune Fischer 13:55:33 08/19/03
          • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 14:53:35 08/19/03
      • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Sune Fischer 11:59:45 08/19/03
        • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 12:24:59 08/19/03
          • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Sune Fischer 13:12:20 08/19/03
            • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Andrew Williams 10:30:56 08/20/03
              • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 14:48:59 08/20/03
                • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Tord Romstad 08:52:18 08/21/03
                  • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 09:12:25 08/21/03
      • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Tord Romstad 11:48:33 08/19/03
        • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 12:21:23 08/19/03
          • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Tord Romstad 08:57:03 08/21/03
            • Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 16:22:44 08/21/03

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.