Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?)

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 11:37:34 08/19/03

Go up one level in this thread

On August 19, 2003 at 12:39:22, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>Worrying about the q-search is hopeless.  The main point is to make the rest
>of the search as accurate as possible, ditto for the evaulation, and then hope
>those two things cover up the inaccuracies in the q-search itself.

You don't think qsearch can be improved significantly? Or you don't think it can
be improved significantly without dominating the program and eating up valuable
plies of full-width search?

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.