Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 11:37:34 08/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 19, 2003 at 12:39:22, Robert Hyatt wrote: >Worrying about the q-search is hopeless. The main point is to make the rest >of the search as accurate as possible, ditto for the evaulation, and then hope >those two things cover up the inaccuracies in the q-search itself. You don't think qsearch can be improved significantly? Or you don't think it can be improved significantly without dominating the program and eating up valuable plies of full-width search?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.