Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 15:06:01 08/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 19, 2003 at 13:16:50, Kerry McDermott wrote: >Back in 1986 Fidelity Excel Club participated in the US Open I think. 8 >machines did 12 rounds (or 12 machines did 8 rnds) and came out with a USCF >rating of 2040 based on those 96 games. That is 282 points higher than its SSDF >rating now. There are many other examples like this one from late 1980's. What >has changed to make this so innacurate? Should one no longer consider the Excel >Club to have a rating of 2040 USCF? > >Regards, > >Kerry two different rating pools. Today's USCF is one pool. Today's SSDF is another. Ratings between two pools are pretty well meaningless unless there is a significant cross-population between the two pools...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.