Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 18:39:40 08/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 19, 2003 at 20:42:12, margolies,marc wrote: >http://news.com.com/2100-1016_3-5065422.html > >just in case you all thought the issue died and chess computing remains >unscathed. I don't know what the particulars of SCO's claims are. I guess I would have to sign an NDA agreement to know that, but there are a number of possibly non-trivial issues I think SCO may have to contend with. (1) Did Linux copy from SCO or did SCO copy from Linux? It's not enough to show that they have code in common. They must also show they are the originators of the code. (2) If it was copied, who did did the copying? An SCO employee? Even if they can show that the Linux code in question was copied from SCO, they have to find who it was did the copying. If it was SCO itself, how can their claim stand? (3)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.