Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Is there going to be a deep sjeng 1.5 for all the bsds ?

Author: Steven Edwards

Date: 08:47:32 08/22/03

Go up one level in this thread

On August 22, 2003 at 04:25:17, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On August 21, 2003 at 17:36:30, ERIQ wrote:
>
>>or just darwin. Also has anyone try to get it to work in freebsd yet and if so
>>how good is it at using two processors.
>
>As I understand it BSD has some compatibility layers for Linux, so maybe
>the Linux version works.
>
>But I wouldn't count on it - Mac OS X didn't have the full functionality
>I needed to get multiprocessor support to work, so I had to disable it
>in the Mac version. I assume other BSD's have the same problem.

What problem?

I have multiple CPU support via POSIX threads in the CT toolkit and the
identical source works on dual CPU machines running Linux AND dual CPU machines
running Mac OS/X 10.2.6 OpenBSD.  I have only a single POSIX mutex for the whole
toolkit and it is accessed only when a thread is created or destroyed.

• Re: Is there going to be a deep sjeng 1.5 for all the bsds ? Gian-Carlo Pascutto 09:37:53 08/22/03
  • Re: Is there going to be a deep sjeng 1.5 for all the bsds ? Russell Reagan 00:32:46 09/01/03
  • Re: Is there going to be a deep sjeng 1.5 for all the bsds ? Dave Gomboc 01:40:57 08/28/03
    • Re: Is there going to be a deep sjeng 1.5 for all the bsds ? Gian-Carlo Pascutto 02:05:04 08/28/03
  • Mac OS X is based on the Mach micro kernel. Dan Andersson 05:47:11 08/23/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.