Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: another reason to abstain

Author: Steven Schwartz

Date: 07:15:01 11/01/98

Go up one level in this thread


On November 01, 1998 at 00:39:40, blass uri wrote:

>
>On October 31, 1998 at 16:36:54, Steven Schwartz wrote:
>
>>On October 31, 1998 at 16:03:29, blass uri wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>On October 31, 1998 at 07:37:45, blass uri wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I abstained in the question because the question is not fair
>>>
>>>It is not clear which program is best because one program may be best when it is
>>>running on pentium200MMX and another program may be best when it is running on
>>>K6 machine or on the newest pentium.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>You could abstain or just assume that everything is
>>run on equal hardware, which is what I did.
>>- Steve
>
>My point is that the results may be different if you use different equal
>hardware.
>
>I know that Fritz5 is optimized for the pentium200MMX and not for the K6
>machines or the newest pentium.
>
>Uri

Then the question is... how do you phrase a poll question,
that is not twelve paragrapghs long, considering all of the
variables that have to be met according to your standards?
- Steve



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.