Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 23:27:59 08/23/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 23, 2003 at 19:55:31, Sune Fischer wrote: >On August 23, 2003 at 19:35:22, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >>> >>>Yes you can do that, if you don't need to know where the attacks came from. >>> >>>It won't be a super accurate SEE, for how do you do x-ray attacks using that? >> >>And how do you do it accurately using your 32 bit per square scheme? >> > >You get the map of "primary" attackers by the lookup, I still scan behind them >the most primitive way to see if there is x-ray attackers. But how do you incorporate that x-ray attacker with the lookup's result? You cannot just add its value to the lookup result... > >I just don't see a quicker way, do you? Maybe ignoring x-ray attackers altogether?! After all, quiescence search is all about inaccuracies, isn't it? (disclaimer: I have not tried this idea yet :) > >-S.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.