Author: Günther Simon
Date: 01:44:40 08/25/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 24, 2003 at 22:19:34, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: >>>>ridiculous >>>> >>>>Michael >>>> >>>>>Computer).Also look at DJs Rae8?? in Game 1.Look at Bf8?? by Fritz against >>>>>Kramnik in game 2 and a3?? by Fritz against Kramnik in game 3.There is no >>>>>doubt in My mind that Fritz and Junior are not as strong against human players >>>>>as some of the lessor known Programs .However Chessbase politics has had these >>>>>2 programs playing humans.The stongest programs in the World against humans >>>>>are HIARCS CHESSMASTER and MCHESS. >>>>> am >>>What is ridiculous guy? huh? >> >>Your opinion is ridiculous... >> >>Chess is a logical game and if you are down in >>>Material you should expect to lose.13 plys is very deep for a chess game .After >>>16.g3 it is a lose for Black;the HIARCS shoot out proves this. >> >>The most important factor in Chess is Kingsafety and not Material. >>13 ply is not very deep at all in chess. >>HIARCS 8 has no clue at all here. It does not understand, even after a very long >>search, that 16...Nh2+ is the critical variation and not 16...Qh2+. >>Your shootout is therefore meaningless and proves nothing. >> >>Michael >You got so much to learn Almost all engines choose 16..Nh2+ before settleing >for 16....Qh2+.It seems that you do not do much chess analysis with programs >in addition to being a very weak player. Do we really have to warm up the story when Mr. A.Mirafzali won a contest of U1600 players with the obvious help of computer programs? (although he never reached this strength before and after this tourney in his whole life? - the story can be still found in the archives and in the net) G. Simon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.