Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 16:34:59 08/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2003 at 19:25:39, Steve Maughan wrote: >Ricardo, > >>"For example I have never used capture searches and rely instead on a static >>swap off routine." >> >>This seems to indicate that CG does not employ a qsearch. I also understand >>that Junior does something similar. I wonder how this is done? I would >>presume some type of accuracy tradeoff must be involved, but I wonder what? >>I'm very curious about how this is all done and why doesn't everybody do it >>this way? > >I guess it's either some sort of SEE or a routine to resolve the effect of >attack tables. > >>How is all the effort that goes into creating a good eval compatible with >>such a handling of non-quiescent positions? It just seems kind of wacky to me. > >It's different - and it clearly did work well in the 80s and 90s. > >Regards, > >Steve It's working pretty well right now in Junior too. I haven't been able to find anything on this using google or citeseer. I guess how to make this work is being kept secret? It would be nice if RL could be persuaded to reveal this.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.