Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 15:34:27 08/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2003 at 23:47:25, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >On August 26, 2003 at 22:19:53, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >>On August 26, 2003 at 20:02:19, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >> >>>On August 26, 2003 at 19:01:30, Dan Andersson wrote: >>> >>>> Uck! A real bummer since the AMD x87 is a stellar performer. >>>> >>>>MvH Dan Andersson >>> >>>I just looked at the Spec2k, and I did not notice AMD x87 is stellar performer: >>> >>>http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2003q3/cpu2000-20030728-02428.html >>>http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2003q3/cpu2000-20030630-02310.html >>>http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2003q2/cpu2000-20030505-02137.html >> >>Neither of those other CPUs (Itanium and Power) is crippled by a stupid ISA. :) > >Itanium *also* supports x86 ISA in the hardware. That shows that hardware >support of x86 ISA does not prevent high FP performance :-) Run an x86 binary on that Itanium and give me the SPECFP score from it. If it's higher than 600 I'll be impressed. :P >>They are also running native (64-bit) binaries, which Opteron was not. > >Ok, here is SPEC results of Opteron running 64-bit binaries :-) > >http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2003q3/cpu2000-20030728-02417.html With a crappy compiler too. Until they have at least decent compiler for AMD64, I don't give much weight to the results of testing it for SPEC.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.