Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 17:59:07 08/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 2003 at 20:02:59, Brian Kostick wrote: >Eduard, > > I know this is not what you asked but generally I would not run such files >attached to email as they are generally virus. If you have already run said >patch, you probably need to run virus scanning software to remove it. > >You should be able to get Microsoft approved patches and updates at: >http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com/ > >Regards, >BK Therefore it goes: The problem is not that I no good virus scanner would have. I discovered the virus! I find the pretended email address of Microsoft irritating - or dispatch now also the virus (unbeabsichtlicht naturally). Therefore it goes. Why can't a company not completely close or stress such as Microsoft * @microsoft.com for itself in the Web? Therefore it concerns, and not my scanner. The danger is thus less in the virus message, but because of the _irritating_ eMail address. Eduard German: Darum geht es: Das Problem ist NICHT dass ich keinen guten Virenscanner hätte. Ich habe ja den Virus ja entdeckt! Irritierend finde ich die vorgetäuschte eMail Adresse von microsoft - oder versenden die nun auch einen Virus (unbeabsichtlicht natürlich). Darum geht es. Warum kann ein Konzern wie Microsoft denn nicht *.@microsoft.com denn nicht gänzlich für sich selbst im Web sperren oder beanspruchen? Darum geht es, und nicht um meinen Scanner. Die Gefahr liegt also weniger im der Virusmeldung selbst, sondern an der irritierenden eMail adresse.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.