Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 12:44:00 08/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 28, 2003 at 15:39:19, William Penn wrote: >Are these Shreddermarks normal? > >AMD Athlon XP 2400+ processor, 2.0 GHz, 640MB installed, 608MB available, >Windows XP Home, Shredder 7 > > 4MB hash, Shreddermark=1591, 391kN/s > 64MB hash, Shreddermark=1392, 349kN/s >128MB hash, Shreddermark=1113, 291kN/s >256MB hash, Shreddermark= 856, 222kN/s >384MB hash, Shreddermark= 655, 179kN/s >432MB hash, Shreddermark= 618, 165kN/s >455MB hash, Shreddermark= 618, 161kN/s (maximum hash) > >I don't understand why the Shreddermark and kN/s decreases as the amount of hash >is increased. That's what concerns me. > >I presume that the more hash allocated then the faster the engine is supposed to >calculate. If so, then why does the speed decrease with more hash? >WP 64 MB hash has always been the magic number at fast time control for most top programs, but 128MB is fine too for standard time control :-) Pichard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.