Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 07:10:06 08/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 2003 at 09:32:42, Geoff wrote: >snipped > >>I watched this game while it was played, which was of course extremely >>painful. Of course, the game should have been lost, but my opponent >>was satisfied with a draw when he got into time trouble. >> >>Tord > > >Hi Tord Hi! >I just played that game through in CM9000, I didn't think it was that bad >really. Was your opponent a human or a program ? I wasn't sure ? A human. >If its any consolation CM9000 agreed more with your moves than Whites ! Which is not very suprising, considering that white was a human rated 1960 while black was a computer rated 2591. > White Black >Book Move 0 1 >Leave Book 0 0 >CM9000 Agrees 29 33 >CM9000 Disagrees 7 3 >Agreement Pct. 81% 92% >Total Error 18.42 5.72 >Relevant Error 14.44 5.72 >Missed Mate 0 0 >Moved Into Mate 0 0 The number of horrible moves in the game may not be terribly high, but the moves which are bad are _really_ bad. I was horrified to see my program play the "attacking" move 12... g5?? >It's interessting you replied with a Gothmog game, a few evenings ago I left my >PC playing a 150 game match between my prog and yours. >I think it was probably an earlier version of yours as I suprisingly won >narrowly. It is probably version 0.2.10, the latest publically available version (0.3.0 will be ready within a month, I think). My program is not terribly strong, and your win in a 150 game match shouldn't be a big surprise. :-) >Can't remember the exact score but they were pretty evenly matched What is the name of your program? Does it have an account on ICC or FICS, and is there a download somewhere? Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.