Author: Timmay
Date: 17:11:14 08/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 2003 at 17:16:14, Terry McCracken wrote: >Sorry Timmay!:) You're not really telling us anything we don't already know, and >some things that are obviously debatable. > >Terry >P.S. > >I kicked Junior 8s chips in a blitz game, as it failed to recognize my attack >that was about to shred it's King, untill it was too late. But I find the best >programmes have similar shortcomings, but for the most part they are tough to >beat and easy to lose to. > >You never touched on HIARCS 8? Anyways, I'm waiting for HIARCS 9 to be sent out >to me, on Sept. 9. > >A Chess Programme Junkie!:o) Hello Terry. Well apparently NOT everyone knows about that, because people continue to test their programs wrong (I think Christophe is a fantastic tester though). I'm very experienced in playing, teaching, and working hand in hand with all these computers for years. So why is it that everyone only responds negatively? I was giving my impression of a topic that interests me. I wasn't intending to come across as a "know it all" or anything of the sort. I thought it would be helpful to programmers to get some sort of indepth analysis of the programs and the moves they produce. Best wishes. P.S.- I did mention HIARCS 8.0 if you look up a post or two.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.