Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 18:50:14 08/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 2003 at 20:11:14, Timmay wrote: >On August 30, 2003 at 17:16:14, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>Sorry Timmay!:) You're not really telling us anything we don't already know, and >>some things that are obviously debatable. >> >>Terry >>P.S. >> >>I kicked Junior 8s chips in a blitz game, as it failed to recognize my attack >>that was about to shred it's King, untill it was too late. But I find the best >>programmes have similar shortcomings, but for the most part they are tough to >>beat and easy to lose to. >> >>You never touched on HIARCS 8? Anyways, I'm waiting for HIARCS 9 to be sent out >>to me, on Sept. 9. >> >>A Chess Programme Junkie!:o) > >Hello Terry. Well apparently NOT everyone knows about that, because people >continue to test their programs wrong (I think Christophe is a fantastic tester >though). I'm very experienced in playing, teaching, and working hand in hand >with all these computers for years. > >So why is it that everyone only responds negatively? I was giving my impression >of a topic that interests me. I wasn't intending to come across as a "know it >all" or anything of the sort. I thought it would be helpful to programmers to >get some sort of indepth analysis of the programs and the moves they produce. > >Best wishes. > >P.S.- I did mention HIARCS 8.0 if you look up a post or two. You did...but it was too brief. Wait...hold that thought!:o)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.