Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 20:35:47 08/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 2003 at 11:46:09, Nolan Denson wrote:
>Over the pass few days i have been playing with Dr Hyatt's with Mike Bynre's
>mods. Things started out great but soon went sour. The Fischer Style for his
>lates mod's finally ran into the top programs and could not win. So i tried to
>do my own tweaks and things got worst. Before i knew it Crafty (Fischer) had a
>rating of 2598. So i thought if this Crafty played better than the others ...
>how about i use the same parameters for a earlier build of this crafty. After
>days of trying .. i finally found an earlier build of the mod crafty that plays
>sure. These games against top programs is some of the best I have seen.
>Please check out the game below Tiger 15 didn't see it coming.
>
>pathologist (2859) vs. DEUTERONOMY (2800) --- 2003.08.30 11:09:53 Rated Blitz
>match, initial time: 3 minutes, increment: 3 seconds
>
> 1. e4 (0:00) e5 (0:00)
> 2. Nf3 (0:00) Nc6 (0:00)
> 3. Bc4 (0:00) Bc5 (0:00)
> 4. d3 (0:00) Nf6 (0:12)
> 5. c3 (0:00) O-O (0:11)
> 6. O-O (0:00) d6 (0:00)
> 7. Nbd2 (0:00) a6 (0:00)
> 8. a4 (0:00) Ba7 (0:00)
> 9. Bb3 (0:00) Kh8 (0:00)
> 10. Nc4 (0:00) Be6 (0:00)
> 11. Bg5 (0:00) h6 (0:12)
> 12. Be3 (0:04) Kg8 (0:12)
> 13. Bxa7 (0:06) Rxa7 (0:09)
> 14. Re1 (0:00) b6 (0:09)
> 15. Ba2 (0:06) Re8 (0:10)
> 16. b4 (0:04) Qd7 (0:12)
> 17. Ne3 (0:07) Bxa2 (0:11)
> 18. Rxa2 (0:01) Qe6 (0:08)
> 19. Qc2 (0:05) Nh5 (0:08)
> 20. Nd5 (0:05) Ne7 (0:08)
> 21. Ne3 (0:04) Nf4 (0:09)
> 22. g3 (0:04) Nh3+ (0:04)
> 23. Kg2 (0:06) Raa8 (0:02)
> 24. a5 (0:11) b5 (0:00)
> 25. d4 (0:05) c6 (0:02)
> 26. dxe5 (0:04) dxe5 (0:03)
> 27. Rd1 (0:05) Rad8 (0:08)
> 28. Raa1 (0:04) Ng5 (0:04)
> 29. Nxg5 (0:01) hxg5 (0:01)
> 30. Rxd8 (0:03) Rxd8 (0:07)
> 31. Rd1 (0:20) Rxd1 (0:00)
> 32. Qxd1 (0:06) f6 (0:01)
> 33. c4 (0:05) Kf7 (0:07)
> 34. f3 (0:00) bxc4 (0:07)
> 35. Qc2 (0:07) Nc8 (0:00)
> 36. Nxc4 (0:06) Na7 (0:07)
> 37. Ne3 (0:31) Nb5 (0:07)
> 38. Nf5 (0:00) g6 (0:07)
> 39. Nh6+ (0:10) Kg7 (0:00)
> 40. Ng4 (0:05) Nd4 (0:01)
> 41. Qc5 (0:04) Qa2+ (0:03)
> 42. Kh3 (0:04) Nxf3 (0:07)
> 43. Qa7+ (0:03) Qf7 (0:04)
> 44. Qxa6 (0:06)
>
>[D]8/5qk1/Q1p2pp1/P3p1p1/1P2P1N1/5nPK/7P/8 b - - 0 1
>What does you engine see
>
> 44. ......... f5!!! (0:00)
> 45. Nf2 (0:04)
>[D]8/5qk1/Q1p3p1/P3ppp1/1P2P3/5nPK/5N1P/8 b - - 1 1
>
>
> Ne1 !!!!! (0:04) Mate in 10 was announced
>Crafty found this in 5 seconds ... its possible it was pondering it.
>
> 46. Qxc6 (0:03) g4+ (0:09)
> 47. Nxg4 (0:00) fxg4+ (0:01)
> 48. Kh4 (0:02) Nf3+ (0:04)
> 49. Kxg4 (0:35) Ng1 (0:00)
> 50. Kg5 (0:20) Qe7+ (0:00)
> 51. Kg4 (0:18) Qd8 (0:00)
> 52. Qb7+ (0:00) Kh6 (0:00)
> 53. Qh7+ (0:03) Kxh7 (0:00)
> 54. b5 (0:00) Kh6 (0:00)
> 55. b6 (0:00) Qg5# (0:00)
> {White checkmated} 0-1
It is worth noting that Tiger 15 sees these moves rather quickly (almost
instantly actually) with significant scores in a few seconds.
So do almost all the other top chess programs.
So if there are interesting moves (in the sense of surprising for a computer) in
this game, they must be somewhere else.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.