Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: one vote for STAND QUIET from Mridul.

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 12:39:12 08/31/03

Go up one level in this thread


On August 31, 2003 at 09:55:17, Uri Blass wrote:

>>>>I do not find something illogical in the original explanation
>>>>
>>>>I think that there are good rules not to extend checks but the rule that was
>>>>used was not good enough and you may need more conditions not to extend in order
>>>>not to do the mistake of not extending important moves.
>>>
>>>Well, as soon as you have found some rules please post.
>>
>>Checker is a lone attacker, undefended but attacked by non-pinned piece..?
>>Happens all the time I think, just print incheck() positions from the tree.
>>
>>-S.
>
>not good enough because pins are not the main problem here and I suspect that
>indirect threats may be a bigger problem.

No.

>I do not want to discuss it(I already have one rule when not to extend checks
>but I plan later to find more rules and telling other people about them meaning
>losing my relative advantage).

If you don't want to discuss it, why do you post on the thread?

-S.
>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.