Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CT benchmarks: bitboard vs. non bitboard

Author: Bo Persson

Date: 13:45:47 08/31/03

Go up one level in this thread


On August 31, 2003 at 07:15:40, Steven Edwards wrote:

>My priorities with CT are, in order:
>
>1. Correctness
>2. Portability
>3. Simplicity
>4. Feature set
>5. Speed
>

But then you publish it as a "benchmarks: bitboard vs. non bitboard". :-)

I was merely trying to explains why the bitboard version takes three times as
long, and not just twice as long. It's because it is doing more work than is
actually needed, IMO.


Bo Persson



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.