Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: CT benchmarks: bitboard vs. non bitboard

Author: Steven Edwards

Date: 01:52:00 09/01/03

Go up one level in this thread

On August 31, 2003 at 13:31:56, Uri Blass wrote:

>I have some questions:
>
>1)Do you include also:
>
>4. For each color, the BB of squares attacked by that color.
>6. For each square, the BB of squares attacked from that square.
>7. For each square, the BB of squares attacking to that square.

Yes.

>2)How do you calculate the time that cycle takes and the number of cycles per
>node?

CT has the rough equivalent of command line parameters.  These include the
-CPUFrequency option which tells CT how fast the host machine is running.  That
information along with calls to getrusage() and some arithmetic does the trick.

• Re: CT benchmarks: bitboard vs. non bitboard Uri Blass 02:46:39 09/01/03
  • Re: CT benchmarks: bitboard vs. non bitboard Steven Edwards 11:21:25 09/01/03
    • Re: CT benchmarks: bitboard vs. non bitboard Uri Blass 11:25:38 09/01/03
      • Re: CT benchmarks: bitboard vs. non bitboard Steven Edwards 22:21:07 09/01/03
        • Re: CT benchmarks: bitboard vs. non bitboard Uri Blass 00:14:55 09/02/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.