Author: Roy Brunjes
Date: 05:10:08 09/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 31, 2003 at 23:27:53, Slater Wold wrote: >Can you beat Ruffian's time? (P4 3.06Ghz - 100MB HTs) I am curious to see CM9k >results. > >[D]8/1P1bp1kp/3P1p2/R7/4Pb2/5P2/4KR2/6q1 b - - 0 44 > >00:00:00.0 -0.23 1 3 exd6 b8Q >00:00:00.0 6.83 1 6 Bxd6 >00:00:00.0 6.56 2 369 Bxd6 Ra7 >00:00:00.0 6.82 3 3601 Bxd6 Rf1 Qd4 >00:00:00.0 5.48 4 7116 Bxd6 Rd5 Bc6 Rxd6 Bxb7 >00:00:00.0 5.50 4 14145 Qb1 Rg2+ Kf7 Rh5 Qxb7 Rxh7+ >00:00:00.0 5.89 5 30785 Qb1 Rg2+ Kf7 b8Q Qxb8 dxe7 Kxe7 Rg7+ Kd6 Rxh7 >00:00:00.0 5.91 5 34945 Bxd6 Rd5 Bg3 Rxd7 Qxf2+ Kd3 Qxf3+ >00:00:00.1 6.55 6 67677 Bxd6 Rd5 Qb1 Rg2+ Kf8 Rh5 Bf4 b8Q+ Qxb8 Rxh7 >00:00:00.1 7.01 6 116475 Qb1 Rg2+ Kf7 b8Q Qxb8 dxe7 Bb5+ Kd1 Kxe7 >00:00:00.2 7.57 7 308845 Qb1 Rg2+ Kf7 Rh5 Bb5+ Rxb5 Qxb5+ Kf2 Qxb7 dxe7 Qa7+ Ke2 >00:00:00.9 8.08 8 1229946 Qb1 Rd5 Bb5+ Rxb5 Qxb5+ Kd1 exd6 Rg2+ Bg5 Kc2 Qxb7 Rg1 >00:00:01.4 8.21 9 1982474 Qb1 Rg2+ Kf7 Rh5 Bb5+ Rxb5 Qxb5+ Kf2 Bxd6 f4 Bc5+ Kf3 >Qxb7 >00:00:02.3 8.32 10 3295262 Qb1 Rg2+ Kf7 Rh5 Bb5+ Rxb5 Qxb5+ Kf2 Bxd6 f4 h5 Kg3 >Qxb7 >00:00:02.6 8.56 10 3684627 Bg3 >00:00:03.1 9.68 10 4400400 Bg3 b8Q Qxf2+ Kd1 Qe1+ Kc2 Qxa5 Qb2 Be5 Qb7 Qc3+ Kd1 >Qxf3+ Ke1 >00:00:07.5 13.74 10 11566347 Bh3 Kd3 Qxf2 b8Q Qd2+ Kc4 Qxa5 Qb7 Be6+ Qd5 Qa4+ >Kd3 Qa3+ Kc4 Bxd5+ exd5 Qxd6 >00:00:11.6 13.75 11 18315246 Bh3 Kd3 Qxf2 b8Q Qd2+ Kc4 Qxa5 Qb7 Be6+ Qd5 Qa4+ >Kd3 Qd1+ Kc4 Qe2+ Kd4 Be3+ Kc3 Bxd5 exd5 exd6 >00:00:13.7 14.10 12 21555471 Bh3 >00:00:44.5 M12 12 74559727 Bh3 Kd3 Qxf2 b8Q Bf1+ Kc3 Qe3+ Kb2 Bc4 Qf8+ Kxf8 >dxe7+ Kxe7 Ra7+ Kd6 Ra6+ Kc5 Ra5+ Kb6 Rb5+ Kxb5 e5 Qc1# Here is CM9000 Analysis (SKR Personality) on a Pentium IV 1.8 GHz with 64 MB for hashtables: Time Depth Score Positions Moves 0:02 1/6 -10.78 285158 44...Bh3 45.Kd3 Qxf2 46.b8=Q Qd2+ 47.Kc4 Qc1+ 48.Kb3 Qb1+ 49.Kc4 Bf1+ 50.Kc3 Qxb8 51.dxe7 0:04 1/7 -11.12 458870 44...Bh3 45.Rd5 Bf1+ 46.Rxf1 Qe3+ 47.Kd1 Qc1+ 48.Ke2 Qc2+ 49.Ke1 Bg3+ 50.Rf2 Bxf2+ 51.Kf1 Bg3 52.Rd2 Qxd2 0:08 1/8 -13.28 986427 44...Bh3 45.Kd3 Qxf2 46.b8=Q Bf1+ 47.Kc3 Qe3+ 48.Kb4 Qd4+ 49.Kb3 Bc4+ 50.Ka4 Qd1+ 51.Kb4 Qb3+ 52.Kc5 Be3+ 53.Kc6 Qxb8 0:25 1/9 -16.18 3381483 44...Bh3 45.Kd3 Qxf2 46.b8=Q Bf1+ 47.Kc3 Qe3+ 48.Kb4 Qd4+ 49.Kb3 Bc1 50.Qf8+ Kxf8 51.dxe7+ Kxe7 52.Ra7+ Ke6 53.Re7+ Kxe7 0:53 1/10 -Mate12 7626996 44...Bh3 45.Kd3 Qxf2 46.b8=Q Bf1+ 47.Kc3 Qe3+ 48.Kb4 Qd4+ 49.Kb3 Bc1 50.Qf8+ Kxf8 51.dxe7+ Kxe7 52.Ra7+ Ke6 53.Re7+ Kxe7 54.Kc2 Qb2+ 55.Kd1 Qd2# 1:26 1/11 -Mate12 13013382 44...Bh3 45.Kd3 Qxf2 46.b8=Q Bf1+ 47.Kc3 Qe3+ 48.Kb4 Qd4+ 49.Kb3 Bc1 50.Qf8+ Kxf8 51.dxe7+ Kxe7 52.Ra7+ Ke6 53.Re7+ Kxe7 54.Kc2 Qb2+ 55.Kd1 Qd2# With the speed differences between the two machines (3 GHz and 1.8) I believe CM9000 is a bit faster to see the mate. But mate in 12 is seen, not 11. Roy
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.