Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The need to unmake move

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 20:40:19 09/01/03

Go up one level in this thread


On September 01, 2003 at 23:39:13, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On August 29, 2003 at 18:32:46, Jeremiah Penery wrote:
>
>>On August 29, 2003 at 08:46:12, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On August 28, 2003 at 19:12:52, Jeremiah Penery wrote:
>>>
>>>>But it's not more latency than you get *best case* when using a traditional SMP
>>>>setup.  So you can only gain, even with a "poor algorithm".
>>>
>>>If you compare an SMP xeon to a dual 486 you _also_ "win".
>>
>>And what is that supposed to demonstrate?
>
>That you can win with a poor algorithm, when the hardware is faster.
>But you won't win anywhere near max theoretical "win".
>
>For a chess person, that's important.
>
>We work for 5% _all_ the time.
>
>
>>
>>>But my point was that with a NUMA architecture, you might win a lot less
>>>than you could, if the algorithm doesn't take into account the specific
>>>architectural issues with a NUMA machine.
>>>
>>>My point was, again, that you want most references from a CPU to go to its
>>>local memory for max performance.  It's an issue on _all_ NUMA-type machines.
>>
>>Of course I know that.  My point is that with Opteron, even if you are accessing
>>non-local memory *always*, you are not accessing it slower than you would with,
>>say, a traditional SMP machine (2x Xeon, for instance).
>
>
>OK.. Buy that F-1, but you don't get it into 6th gear.  You will be fast.
>
>But you _could_ go a _lot_ faster...
>
>That was my point.
>
>
>
>
>>Of course you can do a lot better - all I'm saying is that there's no way you're
>>going to be doing worse.
>
>I don't remember saying I would be doing worse.  I remember saying I would
>be doing _bad_.  Because potentially all memory references would be non-local.
>
>>
>>Either way you win, even with a crappy NUMA algorithm.
>
>As I said  "if you call that winning..."


Also, I don't think it is that clear.  IE if you have 8 cpus, and 7 of them
are beating on _one_ processor's local memory, you _will_ have problems.

_serious_ problems.  That can happen with the current crafty algorithm.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.