Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: The need to unmake move

Author: Jeremiah Penery

Date: 21:02:34 09/01/03

Go up one level in this thread

On September 01, 2003 at 23:39:13, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On August 29, 2003 at 18:32:46, Jeremiah Penery wrote:
>
>>Of course you can do a lot better - all I'm saying is that there's no way you're
>>going to be doing worse.
>
>I don't remember saying I would be doing worse.  I remember saying I would
>be doing _bad_.  Because potentially all memory references would be non-local.

If you'd be doing "_bad_" in that case, how would you say you're doing now with
SMP, where _every_ access is *slower than worst case* on that Opteron machine?

• Re: The need to unmake move Robert Hyatt 08:06:18 09/02/03
  • Re: The need to unmake move Jeremiah Penery 15:22:25 09/02/03
    • Re: The need to unmake move Robert Hyatt 19:50:21 09/02/03
      • Re: The need to unmake move Jeremiah Penery 21:12:46 09/02/03
        • Re: The need to unmake move Robert Hyatt 09:06:46 09/03/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.