Author: Harald Faber
Date: 08:16:11 09/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 01, 2003 at 22:29:37, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >Neue Partie > >[D]n7/8/8/8/7p/7p/7p/5K1k b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Junior 8: > >1...Sb6 2.Ke2 > -+ (-9.78) Tiefe: 3 00:00:00 >1...Sb6 2.Ke2 Kg2 > -+ (-10.06) Tiefe: 6 00:00:00 >1...Sb6 2.Kf2 Sc4 3.Kf3 Kg1 > -+ (-10.07) Tiefe: 9 00:00:00 >1...Sb6 2.Kf2 Sa4 3.Kf1 Sc3 4.Kf2 > -+ (-10.12) Tiefe: 12 00:00:00 1kN >1...Sb6 2.Kf2 Sc4 3.Kf1 Se3+ 4.Kf2 Sd5 5.Kf1 > -+ (-10.12) Tiefe: 15 00:00:00 4kN >1...Sb6 2.Kf2 Sc4 3.Kf1 Sd2+ 4.Kf2 Se4+ 5.Kf1 Sg3+ 6.Kf2 Se2 7.Kf1 Sd4 8.Kf2 > -+ (-10.12) Tiefe: 18 00:00:00 13kN >1...Sb6 2.Kf2 Sc4 3.Kf1 Sd2+ 4.Kf2 Se4+ 5.Kf1 Sg5 6.Kf2 Se6 7.Kf1 Sd4 > -+ (-10.12) Tiefe: 21 00:00:00 27kN >1...Sb6 2.Kf2 Sc4 3.Kf1 Sd2+ 4.Kf2 Se4+ 5.Kf1 Sg5 6.Kf2 Se6 7.Kf1 Sf4 8.Kf2 Sd3+ >9.Kf3 Kg1 > -+ (-10.11) Tiefe: 24 00:00:01 66kN, tb=2 >1...Sb6 2.Kf2 Sc4 3.Kf1 Sd2+ 4.Kf2 Se4+ 5.Kf1 Sc3 6.Kf2 Sd1+ 7.Kf1 Se3+ 8.Kf2 >Sf5 9.Kf1 Sg3+ 10.Kf2 Se2 > -+ (-10.11) Tiefe: 27 00:00:01 151kN, tb=12 >1...Sb6 2.Kf2 Sc4 3.Kf1 Sd2+ 4.Kf2 Se4+ 5.Kf1 Sc3 6.Kf2 Sd1+ 7.Kf1 > -+ (-10.11) Tiefe: 30 00:00:02 309kN, tb=45 >1...Sb6 2.Kf2 Sc4 3.Kf1 Sd2+ 4.Kf2 Se4+ 5.Kf1 Sc3 6.Kf2 Sd1+ 7.Kf1 Se3+ 8.Kf2 >Sf5 9.Kf1 Sd4 10.Kf2 Sc6 > -+ (-10.10) Tiefe: 33 00:00:03 636kN, tb=108 >1...Sb6 2.Kf2 Sc4 3.Kf1 Sd2+ 4.Kf2 Se4+ 5.Kf1 Sc3 6.Kf2 Sd1+ 7.Kf1 > -+ (-10.10) Tiefe: 36 00:00:05 1198kN, tb=200 >1...Sb6 2.Kf2 Sc4 3.Kf1 Sd2+ 4.Kf2 Se4+ 5.Kf1 Sc3 6.Kf2 Sd1+ 7.Kf1 > -+ (-10.10) Tiefe: 39 00:00:10 2175kN, tb=365 >1...Sb6 2.Kf2 Sc4 3.Kf1 Sd2+ 4.Kf2 Se4+ 5.Kf1 Sc3 6.Kf2 > -+ (-10.10) Tiefe: 41 00:00:15 3266kN, tb=493 >1...Sb6 2.Kf2 Sc4 3.Kf1 Sd2+ 4.Kf2 Se4+ 5.Kf1 Sc3 6.Kf2 Sd1+ 7.Kf1 Se3+ 8.Kf2 >Sf5 9.Kf1 Sd4 10.Kf2 Sc6 > -+ (-10.09) Tiefe: 43 00:00:22 4781kN, tb=637 >1...Sb6 2.Kf2 Sc4 3.Kf1 Sd2+ 4.Kf2 Se4+ 5.Kf1 Sc3 6.Kf2 Sd1+ 7.Kf1 Se3+ 8.Kf2 >Sf5 9.Kf1 Sd4 10.Kf2 Sc6 > -+ (-10.08) Tiefe: 45 00:00:33 7159kN, tb=924 > >:) What I always say: Don't look at the eval, look at the position. In this case even a look at the PV would be enough to see that the engine sees no win.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.