Author: F. Huber
Date: 10:42:27 09/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 01, 2003 at 22:26:04, Slater Wold wrote: >On September 01, 2003 at 22:25:48, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On September 01, 2003 at 17:25:11, leonid wrote: >> >>>On August 31, 2003 at 23:27:53, Slater Wold wrote: >>> >>>>Can you beat Ruffian's time? (P4 3.06Ghz - 100MB HTs) I am curious to see CM9k >>>>results. >>>> >>>>[D]8/1P1bp1kp/3P1p2/R7/4Pb2/5P2/4KR2/6q1 b - - 0 44 >>> >>> >>>Above position is good but just too long to ponder for my program that have no >>>cash and is run on slow computer. For those that do like, as me, to solve >>>something simple and easy, please try my variation. >>> >>>This new position is the old one with few new pieces that jumped on board. >>> >>>[D]5r2/1PPbp1kp/3P1p1N/R1N4Q/2pBPbr1/n4P1B/4KR2/4n1q1 w - - 0 >>> >>>Hahaha! Only now I found why my program was so slow. I missed the fact that >>>before it was the blacks side that mate whites. >>> >>>Please indicate Your result for last position. >>> >>>Leonid. >> >>Ruffian 1.0.5 - P4 3.06Ghz - 200MB HTs >> >>00:00:00.0 8.74 1 99 b8Q Bxd6 >>00:00:00.0 9.06 1 204 fxg4 >>00:00:00.0 11.37 2 10969 fxg4 Nac2 >>00:00:00.1 11.29 3 54538 fxg4 Be8 Ne6+ Kh8 dxe7 Rg8 b8Q Bxh5 Qxg8# >>00:00:00.1 11.95 3 63359 b8Q Rxb8 cxb8Q Bxd6 fxg4 Bxb8 Nxd7 >>00:00:00.1 11.95 4 93531 b8Q Rxb8 cxb8Q Bxd6 fxg4 Bxb8 Nxd7 >>00:00:00.3 15.08 4 212825 dxe7 Rg8 Bxf6+ Kxf6 Nxd7+ Kg7 b8Q Bxh6 Bxg4 >>00:00:00.8 19.96 5 965898 dxe7 Qxf2+ Kxf2 Bg3+ Kf1 Re8 Bxf6+ Kxf6 Nxd7+ Kxe7 >>Qf7+ Kd6 c8Q >>00:00:01.1 23.61 6 1295605 dxe7 Qxf2+ Kxf2 Bg3+ Kf1 Rg8 Bxf6+ Kxf6 Nxd7+ Kxe7 >>Nxg8+ Rxg8 c8Q Rg6 >>00:00:01.5 23.96 7 1686134 dxe7 >>00:00:03.9 38.20 7 5422485 dxe7 Qxf2+ Kxf2 Nd3+ Nxd3 Rg2+ Bxg2 Bg3+ Kxg3 Be8 >>Qg4+ Bg6 exf8Q+ Kxf8 b8Q+ Kg7 c8Q cxd3 >>00:00:04.5 38.55 8 6254900 dxe7 >>00:00:05.5 Mate in 9 8 7979316 dxe7 Qxf2+ Kxf2 Nd3+ Nxd3 Bg3+ Kf1 Be8 exf8Q+ >>Kxf8 Qxe8+ Kxe8 b8Q+ Ke7 Qd8+ Ke6 c8Q# >>00:00:16.8 Mate in 8 9 26602759 dxe7 Rf7 Qxf7+ Kxh6 Qxf6+ Kh5 Bxg4+ Qxg4 Nxd7+ >>Nb5 e8Q+ Qg6 Rxb5+ Bg5 Rh2# > > >00:00:26.8 Mate in 7 10 42593778 dxe7 Rf7 c8Q Bxh6 Qf8+ Rxf8 exf8Q+ Kxf8 b8Q+ >Ke7 Bxf6+ Kxf6 Qbe5# >00:00:36.9 Mate in 7 11 59836743 dxe7 Rf7 c8Q Bxh6 Qf8+ Rxf8 exf8Q+ Kxf8 b8Q+ >Ke7 Bxf6+ Kxf6 Qbe5# Hi Slater, there must be something wrong with Ruffians ´Mate in 7´ - it is definitely only a mate in 8! Here´s the analysis of Chest: ChestUCI Ver.2.7 UCI: CPU: Celeron 400MHz FEN: 5r2/1PPbp1kp/3P1p1N/R1N4Q/2pBPbr1/n4P1B/4KR2/4n1q1 w - - Search for Mate in 10 ... (Hash=64MB) Mate in 8 found ! (2 Solutions in 09:16) D8 09:21 M8 d6xe7 Qg1xf2 Bd4xf2 Rf8g8 c7c8Q Bd7xc8 b7xc8Q Rg8xc8 Nc5e6 Kg7h8 e7e8Q Rc8xe8 Qh5xe8 Rg4g8 Nh6f7 D8 09:21 M8 b7b8Q Bd7c8 Nc5e6 Kg7h8 d6xe7 Bf4d6 e7xf8Q Bd6xf8 Qb8xc8 Qg1f1 Rf2xf1 Na3b1 Qc8xf8 Rg4g8 Qf8xg8 (Btw, with a faster CPU of today the solution time would be less than 2 min.) Regards, Franz.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.