Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:29:49 09/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 02, 2003 at 15:13:06, Peter Fendrich wrote: >On September 02, 2003 at 14:55:55, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On September 02, 2003 at 14:40:03, Tord Romstad wrote: >> >>>On September 02, 2003 at 08:53:59, Alastair Scott wrote: >>> >>>>[D]r1b1k2r/1p1p1ppp/4pq2/8/pQP1n3/P1n2NP1/1B2PP1P/R3KB1R w KQkq - 2 15 >>>> >>>>When reviewing my (human-human) games with Yace Paderborn it came across a >>>>stunner here: 15.g4!? >>>> >>>>I would not have thought of it for a second, yet it appears to win a piece at >>>>the cost of one or two pawns and a very messy position, hence the "!?". What >>>>does your program think? >>>> >>>>Interestingly, the "stronger" programs tend to go for g4, whereas the "weaker >>>>ones" (plus myself :) go for Rc1. >>> >>>My program -- a very weak one -- prefers g4. >>> >>>Tord >> >>It is not a very weak program. >>It is better than most of the programs in Leo tournament. >> >>It qualified for the 3th division of Leo. >> >>There are 72 programs in the premier division and division 1-3 >> >>There are 160 programs in Leo tournament. >> >>A program that is in the best 72 out of 160 programs is not very weak program. >> >>Uri > >I don't understand your logic. >Why isn't all 160 programs weak or maybe 159 of them? >How do you set the limit for weak? I assume that at least a program that is better than most programs is not a very weak program so at least the best 80 programs are not very weak programs. weak is something relative to other programs. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.