Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 13:18:00 09/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 02, 2003 at 11:03:05, Richard Patterson wrote: >On September 02, 2003 at 10:53:37, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On September 02, 2003 at 10:36:55, Richard Patterson wrote: >> >>>In this position Fritz 8 analysis took 8 minutes to find RD1-G1 but the move >>>score was not much different than the other two best moves QA7-C7 or RD1xD7. The >>>analysis was not much different 22 minutes with RD1-G1 still leading by .70 over >>>the other moves. The analysis at 30+ minutes gave RD1-G1 (+30.38) a decisive >>>advantage over moves #2 QA7-C7 (+16.06) and #3 RD1xD7 (+15.34). >>> >>>How does your favorite chess program see this position. >>> >>>Richard >>> >>>[d]2b5/Q2n3k/2p1p3/1p2Br2/p7/P3P2p/5P2/2KR4 w - - 0 27 >> >>Too many good moves for White. In blitz I'd choose Rxd7+, in a long game Rg1 >>would be more subtle, and to the point, I'm going to Checkmate Black!:o) >> >>Terry > >Hi Terry, > >The outcome of this game does not favor black :) I purchased a Excalibur >Grandmaster to have a fighting chance to win then I review it with Fritz 8 since >my computer issue has been corrected Fritz 8 does not let me WIN. The above >position was a product of that game against the Excalibur Grandmaster. > >Have a great day. > >Richard Ah.....and you played Rg1 against it? If so, very good!:) Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.