Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 07:44:11 09/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 03, 2003 at 10:35:11, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On September 03, 2003 at 10:26:19, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>>What is your point? >> >>Heh :) >> >>You said (remote) checking for fail_high conditions at every node was required, >>and I disagree. > >I never say 'at every node'. You said constantly, then I don't know what you mean by that. >Each time you get a subtree score, you must send out the score update to >all processors, or store it locally and rely on remote processors to check >it in your memory. > >Either way, you need remote accesses. > >Got it now? This is an entirely different matter, you don't get subtree scores "constantly". And I still say you only have to access when there is something to communicate. If you just quietly exit the subtree on a fail low, I see no need for communication. -S. >-- >GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.