Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 07:54:37 09/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 03, 2003 at 10:48:31, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>I only see the need for communication when there is *somthing* to communicate. > >You answer your own question already. There continuesly is something to >communicate. Such as? Whatever it is maybe it can be redesigned by using a smarter message system. The parent thread doesn't need to know *what* the child thread is doing, it only needs to know what the child threads finds, if anything at all, right? -S.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.