Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 10:18:49 09/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 03, 2003 at 10:35:11, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On September 03, 2003 at 10:26:19, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>>What is your point? >> >>Heh :) >> >>You said (remote) checking for fail_high conditions at every node was required, >>and I disagree. > >I never say 'at every node'. > >Each time you get a subtree score, you must send out the score update to >all processors, or store it locally and rely on remote processors to check >it in your memory. > >Either way, you need remote accesses. > >Got it now? > >-- >GCP No, because you don't have to do that. You _can_ ask "did my score appear to change alpha/beta bounds at the split point?" If the answer is no, you do nothing. That is the case 99% of the time.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.