Author: Michael P. Nance Sr.
Date: 14:12:16 09/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 08, 2003 at 16:58:20, Sietel Monic wrote: >Actually its quit contrary.... after looking at the hardware of the top programs >they all use the same hardware > > Rating + - Games Won Oppo > ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- 1 >Shredder 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2768 33 -31 547 72% 2606 2 >Deep Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2760 29 -28 654 70% 2612 3 >Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2740 30 -29 574 64% 2635 4 >Chess Tiger 15.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2726 27 -26 704 64% 2623 4 >Shredder 6.0 Pad UCI 256MB Athlon 1200 2726 24 -23 911 64% 2628 6 >Shredder 6.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2719 31 -30 547 62% 2630 7 >Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 2714 30 -30 557 61% 2635 8 >Deep Fritz 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2710 31 -30 531 62% 2627 8 >Gambit Tiger 2.0 256MB Athlon 1200 Once again,I stand corrected. Althon 1200 MHz is a little on the slow and obsolete side wouldn't You think? I understand the reasoning for an equal compairson, but I tend to want to beleive that with bigger Boxes ,each Program might proform differently by multipling the strenghts. You know Thier strenghts would expand exponently with superior Hardware.>>>>Mike
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.