Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Fail soft alpha-beta

Author: Daniel Clausen

Date: 14:53:58 09/09/03

Go up one level in this thread

On September 09, 2003 at 17:41:44, Dieter Buerssner wrote:

>On September 08, 2003 at 23:21:53, Russell Reagan wrote:
>
>>These all sound like good reasons to use fail soft. What are the drawbacks to
>>fail soft, and the reasons to use fail hard?

Well, fail-hard gives me less headaches. :) I do a search with the window
[alpha, beta] and I get a result within that range. I like that. :)

Sargon

• Re: Fail soft alpha-beta Russell Reagan 15:22:44 09/09/03
  • Re: Fail soft alpha-beta Angrim 22:42:21 09/10/03
• Re: Fail soft alpha-beta Dieter Buerssner 15:03:28 09/09/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.