Author: Gerd Isenberg
Date: 06:27:35 09/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 10, 2003 at 08:36:59, Uri Blass wrote:
>I thought about probing the pawn hash not every move but only after pawn moves
>but the problem is that there are cases when I undo some moves and there is
>already old pawn hash entry in that place that is a different position so I
>cannot assume that I do not need to probe it after quiet moves.
>
>Do you probe pawn hash tables after every move(I evaluate every node)?
Yes, iirc.
>
>
>
>I also asked about pawn hash tables also some days ago but got no reply
>
>Here is my post
>
>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?314617
>
Looks reasonable to me on the fly.
Instead of
if (phashe->key == zob)
return 1;
else
return 0;
i would prefere
return (phashe->key == zob);
although the compiler/optimizer should produce the same branchless code.
Gerd
>
>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.