Author: Derek Paquette
Date: 15:34:12 09/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 10, 2003 at 18:19:48, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 10, 2003 at 18:17:20, Peter Fendrich wrote: > >>On September 10, 2003 at 12:59:21, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>There is a correspondense player(ICCF rating 2384 and Fide rating 2269) >>>who believes that he can achieve no worse than 5-1 against computers in the same >>>conditions that Arno Nickel plays(2585 Elo in cc) >>> >>>see >>>http://www.correspondencechess.com/bbs/messages/49460.html >>> >>>He told me by email that he is also interested in playing a similiar match. >>>I do not think that chessbase will agree (they have not infinite computer time) >>>but I thought that maybe it is possible to use some posters here as operaters(I >>>do not have computer time for that task) >>> >>>What is your opinion? >>> >>>Can he get 5-1 against computers? >>>Are there people with fast hardware that can give their computers to play >>>against him(we need 6 different fast computers when Tansel Turgut does not >>>know the programs that he is playing). >>> >>>Uri >> >>As I understand he is allowed to use computers himself. >>In that case I wouldn't be surprised if he get these figures. >>He can use several engines analyses and make choices based on that. >>I suppose that he will use the best there is. >>His opponents are just one each of the engines he is using or something weaker. >>/Peter > >Yes but the opponents have time advantage because I do not expect him to use 6 >different fast computers for 6 games so I expect the computers to use more >computer time. > >Uri thats a very good point, I don't see how he can do 5-1, a. he'll be working between more than 1 game b. his program won't be looking nearly as deep per game as ours are c. frusteration and human error could play a big role
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.