Author: Uri Blass
Date: 16:57:18 09/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 10, 2003 at 18:57:56, Derek Paquette wrote: >On September 10, 2003 at 18:55:31, Peter Fendrich wrote: > >>On September 10, 2003 at 18:19:48, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On September 10, 2003 at 18:17:20, Peter Fendrich wrote: >>> >>>>On September 10, 2003 at 12:59:21, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>There is a correspondense player(ICCF rating 2384 and Fide rating 2269) >>>>>who believes that he can achieve no worse than 5-1 against computers in the same >>>>>conditions that Arno Nickel plays(2585 Elo in cc) >>>>> >>>>>see >>>>>http://www.correspondencechess.com/bbs/messages/49460.html >>>>> >>>>>He told me by email that he is also interested in playing a similiar match. >>>>>I do not think that chessbase will agree (they have not infinite computer time) >>>>>but I thought that maybe it is possible to use some posters here as operaters(I >>>>>do not have computer time for that task) >>>>> >>>>>What is your opinion? >>>>> >>>>>Can he get 5-1 against computers? >>>>>Are there people with fast hardware that can give their computers to play >>>>>against him(we need 6 different fast computers when Tansel Turgut does not >>>>>know the programs that he is playing). >>>>> >>>>>Uri >>>> >>>>As I understand he is allowed to use computers himself. >>>>In that case I wouldn't be surprised if he get these figures. >>>>He can use several engines analyses and make choices based on that. >>>>I suppose that he will use the best there is. >>>>His opponents are just one each of the engines he is using or something weaker. >>>>/Peter >>> >>>Yes but the opponents have time advantage because I do not expect him to use 6 >>>different fast computers for 6 games so I expect the computers to use more >>>computer time. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Why shouldn't he use more computers/processors? That is the way to do it - the >>more the better. Some of them analysing his own ideas and variants and some of >>them running day and night analysing the current positions. This strategy can be >>adjusted during the game. For instance when only one move from the opponent is >>realistic. >>Maybe he is a computer sales man? :-) >> >>/Peter >er....what exactly are the usual specifications of this game? >like 1 move a day ? The match that is organized by chessbase is 3 or 4 days per move and he talked about similiar conditions so I guess at least 3 days per move. I agree with peter that in theory he can use many processors but I tend to believe that practically people do not buy many fast computers only for correspondence chess and when some people play together against one person they have time advantage. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.