Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:43:15 09/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 10, 2003 at 19:15:11, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On September 10, 2003 at 12:59:21, Uri Blass wrote: > >>There is a correspondense player(ICCF rating 2384 and Fide rating 2269) >>who believes that he can achieve no worse than 5-1 against computers in the same >>conditions that Arno Nickel plays(2585 Elo in cc) >> >>see >>http://www.correspondencechess.com/bbs/messages/49460.html >> >>He told me by email that he is also interested in playing a similiar match. >>I do not think that chessbase will agree (they have not infinite computer time) >>but I thought that maybe it is possible to use some posters here as operaters(I >>do not have computer time for that task) >> >>What is your opinion? >> >>Can he get 5-1 against computers? > >Of course he can get a 5-1. That is no problem at all. >It is just very time-consuming (and somewhat boring). Maybe for you it is going to be boring but I think that it may be interesting for programmers to see what weaknesses their program have at long time control. If the programs are strong enough you cannot get better than 3-3 and if the programs do losing mistakes even when they get many hours then learning what are the mistakes that they do may be interesting for programmers. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.