Author: Uwe Meißner
Date: 03:11:28 09/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 11, 2003 at 05:36:57, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 10, 2003 at 17:00:01, Ed Panek wrote: > >>On September 10, 2003 at 12:59:21, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>There is a correspondense player(ICCF rating 2384 and Fide rating 2269) >>>who believes that he can achieve no worse than 5-1 against computers in the same >>>conditions that Arno Nickel plays(2585 Elo in cc) >>> >>>see >>>http://www.correspondencechess.com/bbs/messages/49460.html >>> >>>He told me by email that he is also interested in playing a similiar match. >>>I do not think that chessbase will agree (they have not infinite computer time) >>>but I thought that maybe it is possible to use some posters here as operaters(I >>>do not have computer time for that task) >>> >>>What is your opinion? >>> >>>Can he get 5-1 against computers? >>>Are there people with fast hardware that can give their computers to play >>>against him(we need 6 different fast computers when Tansel Turgut does not >>>know the programs that he is playing). >>> >>>Uri >> >> >>I will use my Dual 2800+ Athlon system and Deep Sjeng to play him...How long are >>we talking here? >> >> >>Ed > >I guess 3 days per move. > >Uri But you should be able to act flexible, as sometimes there are moves that are forced in a positional sense (must not be answering to a simple check), and sometimes it could be useful to take a week for a move. But on the other side the man behind the machine should not be allowed to play following his own ideas. Did you think about this too? Uwe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.