Author: Ed Panek
Date: 05:33:35 09/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 11, 2003 at 06:11:28, Uwe Meißner wrote: >On September 11, 2003 at 05:36:57, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On September 10, 2003 at 17:00:01, Ed Panek wrote: >> >>>On September 10, 2003 at 12:59:21, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>There is a correspondense player(ICCF rating 2384 and Fide rating 2269) >>>>who believes that he can achieve no worse than 5-1 against computers in the same >>>>conditions that Arno Nickel plays(2585 Elo in cc) >>>> >>>>see >>>>http://www.correspondencechess.com/bbs/messages/49460.html >>>> >>>>He told me by email that he is also interested in playing a similiar match. >>>>I do not think that chessbase will agree (they have not infinite computer time) >>>>but I thought that maybe it is possible to use some posters here as operaters(I >>>>do not have computer time for that task) >>>> >>>>What is your opinion? >>>> >>>>Can he get 5-1 against computers? >>>>Are there people with fast hardware that can give their computers to play >>>>against him(we need 6 different fast computers when Tansel Turgut does not >>>>know the programs that he is playing). >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>> >>>I will use my Dual 2800+ Athlon system and Deep Sjeng to play him...How long are >>>we talking here? >>> >>> >>>Ed >> >>I guess 3 days per move. >> >>Uri > > >But you should be able to act flexible, as sometimes there are moves that are >forced in a positional sense (must not be answering to a simple check), and >sometimes it could be useful to take a week for a move. But on the other side >the man behind the machine should not be allowed to play following his own >ideas. Did you think about this too? > >Uwe
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.